Somebody despatched Mark Cuban a profane Ethereum Title Service area a couple of days in the past. After observant Twitter customers recently tracked down his ether address, it was solely a matter of time earlier than a wave of undesirable spam transactions made their means into his account. That is, in any case, the web. Right here there be monsters.
Whereas it isn’t completely clear what the presumed troll’s endgame was, the phrase was nonetheless offensive sufficient to lift some eyebrows at Cointelegraph, and we don’t intend to reprint it right here. Suffice to say, an honest particular person wouldn’t wish to be generally known as the proprietor of this area, even when they weren’t a star billionaire.
We reached out to Mark Cuban to search out out, initially, if he knew something about its origin. Had he bought it himself? Was he even conscious he owned it? And most significantly, what have been his plans for the identify going ahead?
“Rattling. No, I do not personal [it]. I assume anybody can put an eth tackle to a website. I do not even know if it’s potential to alter it. Thanks for the heads up.”
Whereas Cuban has become increasingly involved in the blockchain space of late, he’s nonetheless a relative newcomer to sure facets of the neighborhood. As such, his understanding of how Ethereum Title Service, or ENS, domains are acquired, managed, and transferred was considerably restricted initially.
ENS gives customers a decentralized solution to use human-readable words for his or her blockchain tackle as a substitute of an unwieldy alpha-numeric string. Vitalik Buterin, as an illustration, is understood to make the most of vitalik.eth for his tackle as a substitute of 0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045. Simple peasy.
The issue with this service is that when you personal an ENS area, you’ll be able to level it at any tackle on the Ethereum blockchain with out requiring permission from the tackle’ proprietor. This enables web tricksters to focus on offensive domains at unsuspecting customers in an try to make it seem that they’re appropriating unsavory phrases and phrases by selection.
Cuban picked up on this inherent issue, noting “it is apparent that it was despatched to me and I did not purchase it.” He requested Cointelegraph “Is it potential to cancel [the name] or reject the contract?” Digging deeper, it turned clear that the troll had made one thing of an error in judgement. There are three components to an ENS area — the Registrant, which is the proprietor, the Controller, which manages subdomains in addition to the place the area identify factors, and the File, which notes the precise tackle the place cash are acquired when the area is enter right into a pockets.
Usually, when mischief makers level a website at an unsuspecting consumer’s tackle, they solely change both the Controller or the File. They don’t often hand over complete management of the area itself. This specific troll, who Cuban amusingly known as an “fool”, had as a substitute offered the total Registrant rights to his tackle. This allotted him unfettered possession and management of the area.
With that in thoughts, and with some technical assist from Cointelegraph, Cuban struck on a means to one-up the foolish troll and eliminate the identify as soon as and for all. He altered the Controller, File, and at last Registrant in order that they might every be owned by a burner tackle — i.e. an tackle whose personal keys are nullified both by design or intention. In Mark’s case, this concerned creating a brand new throwaway pockets himself, with the target of creating it inaccessible as soon as his mission was full. When requested about his timeline for disposing of the pockets’s keys, he quipped:
“What keys? They’re gone.”
In consequence, the area now successfully has no proprietor. And so it’ll stay (at the very least till the registration expires.)
When confronted with questions as to how comparable possession quirks must be dealt with in future, Cuban maintained that the accountability for such transgressions in the end falls on the builders of decentralized purposes:
“This can be a drawback that ENS goes to have to repair. There must be acceptance of a switch. In any other case the abuse will probably be actually actually dangerous. This can be a weak point within the system that must be fastened.”
Mark Cuban has been working to mature his stature inside the blockchain neighborhood over the previous few months. Yesterday, he participated in an Ask Me Anything session on Reddit, utilizing the chance to debate the way forward for distributed expertise and conventional finance. In January, he made headlines by comparing crypto’s current trajectory to the dot com bubble — an period which paved the way in which for a few of his preliminary success again within the late 90’s.