Why is human civilization affected by points resembling poverty, inequality, corruption, exploitation, over consumption, environmental issues, biased and censored media, insufficient training, immigration, discrimination, oppression, and tyranny?
Due to the shortage of actual democracy in any respect native, nationwide and worldwide ranges. The “democracy” isn’t used right here to refer what we all know as independence of the judiciary, or having a authorities that executes legislation made by a legislator. I don’t consider on this mannequin both. Pretty much as good as this mannequin works in concept, in observe, it breeds a wide range of inefficiencies, injustices, and corruptions.
The time period “democracy” on this article refers back to the capacity of the folks to take part straight (or to be a cross-sectional delegate) in laws and implementation. Thus I suggest a bottom-up course of, by which the power-less and possess-less folks take part in a gradual motion to determine a brand new social order, a brand new energy distribution mannequin, and a brand new wealth distribution mechanism.
The core perception of the proposal is “the individuals are the system”, in a matter of amount and high quality. Due to this fact we (the folks) want to search out one another, domesticate our frequent world and apply our wills in the actual world to impose radical systemic modifications.
Certainly it isn’t a brand new angle or ingeniously resolution and all through historical past, humankind has gone this manner many instances and failed many instances. Typically it failed due to oppressive governments, and generally it failed as a result of leaders grew to become the brand new oppressive authorities. Whereas the motives of motion and the threats have remained the identical because the earlier ones but, why ought to it find yourself in several end result this time?
Luckily this time we have now progressive applied sciences and instruments to hold out and help the motion until success and human prosperity. The web, cryptography, blockchain, and decentralized governing mechanisms are our instruments. A well-designed recreation concept on high of those instruments will encourage folks to interact in problem-solving in any respect native, nationwide and worldwide ranges concurrently, whereas being rewarded (straight or not directly) due to their participation. The sport guidelines additionally forestall individuals from changing into the brand new tyrant ruling class, whereas the decentralization protects the entire system in opposition to exterior adversaries.
The technique
Whereas it is rather onerous and impractical to show historical past, philosophy, and financial system to everybody and clarify how and why we ended up on this catastrophic human civilization, with the intention to persuade them to revision their worth system and reform their assumptions and misconceptions, Will probably be far simpler to hack current and acquainted ideas and supplies, and enrich the idea with new options.
So by launching a persuasive recreation concept can set off an evolution within the idea definition and idea performance.
One in every of these acquainted ideas and supplies is the cash. Whereas cash itself, isn’t the matter, evidently everybody believes that cash is the trigger and meter of virtually the whole lot on the planet.
“The New Paradigm” makes use of the idea of cash to embody its thesis in a
tangible method. It makes use of the cash as an index of excellence of the cash house owners. It is a new interpretation of the well-known “cash is energy” motto, which is “the cash high quality is energy”.
Certainly “The New Paradigm” introduces not one cash however many community-based monies. An interactive mannequin, by which each group of individuals can plan to create their customized cash and plan tips on how to divide it.
The result might be a free market of various communities with various guidelines and “worth system”s. There might be a wide range of communities with totally different monies or money-less communities(IOUs and even present economies) which can be competing for extra inhabitants with the intention to enhance the worth and recognition of their forex and their values as indicators of the excellence of their group.
The brand new paradigm is a few “true” free market of beliefs and believers, since getting into a group or leaving it -unlike the present communities, ideologies, political regimes, or nations and territories- has no price.
Deeper in “The New Paradigm”
The core components of “The New Paradigm” are the software program and the folks. In different phrases, everybody can obtain and set up the software program on their private pc or cell and begin a group with their associates or like-minded folks.
There isn’t any central management.
Thus, nobody can forestall folks from set up, be part of, department, or depart a group or pressure them too.
Having this software program, we are able to count on to make tens of millions of various communities and currencies, however in observe, solely a handful of them will be capable to amass a major inhabitants. These communities will compete to persuade different folks concerning the worth of their forex and the ethics of their worth system, the excellence of their social order, the equity of their guidelines, the perfection of their governing mannequin, and many others…
Since we already established an actual and clear free-market of ideas, there isn’t a barrier for folks to go away a group in favor of becoming a member of a greater one, and there’s no barrier for communities to adapt profitable methods of profitable communities.
This progress and inter-community enchancment is defined in one other put up, titled “Redefining exchange rates to excellence index in democracy term”
Until right here, we assumed that we had created an actual free market of concepts with out exterior interference, however creating a really free market of thought stays a matter of doubt if we can’t assure the safety and privateness of free and uncensored debating.
These are merely the software program duties and are defined intimately in “What is wrong with current social networks and messengers app”.
To deal with these issues, the software program is designed to be as safe and
libre as doable.
One other requirement for an actual democracy is the opportunity of operating a “free and democratic election”. On this regard, we should reply the next questions.
- Who can set the election topic?
- Who can vote within the election?
- Methods to maintain an election (instantaneous democracy, liquid democracy, Quadratic voting, and many others…)?
- How votes are counted?
- What’s the quorum of acceptance of an individual or legislation?
Once more it’s the software program’s duty to organize all these choices for the group and communities will resolve tips on how to configure elections as they please.
The software program is designed to be as versatile as doable.
As we count on, the elections will lead group to the passage of legal guidelines. Due to Cyber nature of this communities, these handed legal guidelines might be expressed in type of codes and sensible contracts.
This legislation treats everybody mechanically and equally. The mix of a free market of ideas plus democratic polling and “code is legislation” will trigger the “guidelines with out ruling class” and “governance with out authorities” in these communities.
This consequence eliminates the need of legislators, judges, and an executives. This idea could be utilized to all communities that are powered by the software program no matter the place the group members residing, who they’re, and what race or nationality they’ve.
This mechanism embodies actually egalitarian communities throughout the glob. Some communities could be shaped to speak a few native space governance, whereas different group is a few nationwide downside and the opposite one is about international warming.
A person could be member of 1 or two or three concurrently.
Not solely on-line, but in addition offline
To this point we have now defined tips on how to arrange on-line communities which can be democratically created and managed. Now the query could be; how can these on-line societies have an effect on the actual world and enhance the residing circumstances of their members?
In different phrases how a web based society can affect real-life state of affairs?
Along with what’s talked about on this nice article “Netizens: An Anthology” I want to return back to money as a tangible and favorable concept for everyone.
The basic assumption is that the members of a community will begin to use the community’s money in their day-to-day business dealings -and not only for speculation.
Obviously the community money in early days worth nothing, and remains worthless for a while. It is the power point of this money. There will be no IPO, no ICO, no IEO at all.
Instead, it is the community’s mission to empower its money through making something useful for world, either an idea or a physical product. It is the reputation of a society that values its money.
Some societies (like the “imagine” society) may plan to attribute a kind of intrinsic value to their money, and some other follow alternative plans. In the earlier stages, people will try to spend community money in small amounts, for online/offline tipping, gift, temporary jobs, gardening, dog walking, fiver-like projects etc…, and later they will use that money in more serious jobs and larger amounts.
Obviously, the initial market range for communities will be too thin and the community member hardly will find goods or services in exchange the money of community, therefore the early population would promote the community and encourage people to join to the community in order to widen the market range and add more purchasable product or services (in terms of variety and volume) by community money.
The communities grow and increase their reputation, expand their common world, embrace new members and over time the communities increase their money turnover gradually until they meet all their day-to-day
needs directly with their money, without the need to exchange the money for governmental money and vice versa.
If a member of the community can not meet his needs from within his community can get it from members of another community. Obviously s/he needs to exchange the her/his community money to money of the another community.
The software supports most important financial activities such as transactions, remittance, loan and lending (with possibility of both fractional-reserve and not fractional-reserve), pull and push business models, and a subset of smart contracts all in a decentralized model without need to a third party and without need to trust anyone.
Just having customized money under your control, and the possibility of providing capital and running mutual systems (e.g. mutual savings banking, mutual credit) greatly improves the economic situation of a community member. Needless to say, this independent money in some cases is far better than cheap, inflationary governmental fiat money.
A community of capable, minded and relatively richer people that have the possibility of free debate and democratic decision making and funding, will lead influential social movements to force real changes in the real world. This will be the outcome of “The New Paradigm” in the long run.
The software features and technical details
“The New Paradigm” is realized by a software called “Comen” stands for Community maker engine. The Comen gathered and implementedsome necessary and useful features from some different real worlds projects. These features (products) mostly are implemented in ineffective, neutral in matter of utility, biased policies, useless, hard to use or incomplete manner that led no one (or few people) to use those products. As a result seems to have virtually no such products. Here is a list of some current features of Comen.
– a flexible permission-less and uncensorable decentralized domain name system, by which users can register an arbitrary combination of characters and numbers (e.g. Nakamoto, 2Bfree, or 胡) in the blockchain and have absolute control on it.
The domain name owner can use the registered name to publish a unstoppable decentralized website, forum, wiki, podcast or video channel. This registered usernames can be used either to encrypted messaging or
user-friendly money transfer between wallets too.
– the iPGP is a user-friendly implementation of PGP (GPG) as an important encryption tools in citizens privacy protection fight. The Comen implementation solve issues of classic PGP such as key exchange, public
key servers attack, authenticity and cumbersome “web of trust”. Comen
uses iPGP as a default encryption, in application layer,on top of all of its communications. Either between nodes, messaging, or money transferring between wallets.
– the free format blockchain technology which not only supports classic money transactions, but also customized documents such as run a polling, the ballots, weblog posts, wiki pages, media files, etc. because of this flexible data recording potential in Comen, third parties can easily make products as plugins on top of Comen blockchain to implement value added services. Services like supply chain, decentralized identification, dececentralized market, etc…
Since Comen implemented a DAG data structure to record the shared ledger information, it is better to call it block-graph. Comen default consensus algorithm is PoS which I prefer interpret it to Proof of Solidarity (to system) or Proof of Support (the system). The communities can activate PoW consensus or any hybrid consensus of PoS and PoW with different hash algorithms(e.g. ASIC resistance)
– a “Peer to peer payment system” (AKA cryptocurrencies). Whereas the Bitcoin is the first proof of the “money without state” concept, Comen tried to realize the “governance without government”concept as well as addressing Bitcoin’s payment system shortcomings such as limited bandwidth, smart contracts, etc…
In addition Comen implemented an upgrade on software development. As we know, in decentralized systems, “the protocol” is everything and as long as the nodes respect the protocol, it does not matter who is the node runner or what her/his intentions are. If a node breaks the rules, the rest of the network will boycott it. So everyone can join to network and participate, but one of the biggest shortcoming in current Bitcoin implementation is monopolized “protocol” development which cause misinforms and slow down its freedom mission. An small set of developers and their company are controlling Bitcoin protocol, means no decentralization any more. As an example of this misbehave, not surprising that they prefer downgrading the protocol to even smaller block size and less TPS in order to promote their alternative commercial solution in cost of more centralization and less liberty. The Comen and its primitive supporter community (the “imagine” community) have a proper network architecture and mechanisms in order to guarantee the highly democratic protocol and software development.
Because of DAG data structure, the Comen doesn’t face the Transaction Per
Second (TPS) limitation.And because of default supporting of M of N signature schema, and input time lock and output time lock, Comen
supports flexible, various handy payment models. Indeed transaction format in Comen is customize-able. That is, while classic traceable Bitcoin-like transactions are default transaction format, users can use different transaction types (like zk-snark, Monero-like, MW, IoT-friendly, etc or novel transaction formats like TTT or in-jar transactions) depends on their needs all simultaneously in one Block-graph. The developers can implement even
new transaction formats to meet new needs.
– ability of establish standalone, un-censorable, unstoppable and un-spyable online/offline communities (AKA social networks). Needless to say how much we need this software where the gov-corps can mute even a resident or gaslight or paralyze the information flow in certain areas or countries.
In terms of the technical details of the project, perhaps the most controversial part in blockchain concept is the prevention and neutralization of double-spend attacks, specially in a DAG data structure.
The Comen uses a customized CAP theorem and PoS consensus algorithm to address this issue. The main obstacle in order to fight with double-spending is the “speed”. While the rest of the cryptocurrencies exaggerated the emphasis on transaction speed (because of their pure speculative nature), the Comen increased the “maturity” time for each transaction to 12 hours. That is, the transactions immediately are recorded in block-graph, and the coins’ ownership are transferred to recipient, but the recipient can not spend the coins before 12 hours have passed.
So going back to CAP theorem which claim in a “partitioned” distributed system you can not have both Availability and Consistency features together and you can have only one of them. So Comen chose “Availability in spending maturated” coins, and “Consistency in spending not maturated” coins.
Because of this timing we can apply Besantin consensus on a overcrowded
network (even million nodes of validator/participator). Each node immediately records received blocks, and marks the block used coins as used coins. If later the node receives some blocks which are trying to double-spend the coins, the node records all these suspicious blocks in DAG as well.
Meanwhile node generates a report about transaction reception order and sign it and propagate its idea about the right order of transactions, based on its perspective.
The entire network can propagate their report about the order of received
double-spend transactions. The network have 12 hours to this reporting activity. After 12 hours all network will have same set of different reports from different nodes.
So they can evaluate reports, score them based on reporter’s share, and summarize it in order to decide about the real order of transactions. The outcome will be one of these decisions.
A: one of transactions is first transaction (based on majority votes), and it is valid transaction and acceptable, the other transaction(s) will be rejected.
B: Both transactions are rejected and the engaged inputs will be ceased
in favor of network treasury(or be burn).
The actual implementation is a bit more complicated and interested readers can study the consensus process in software source code.
In short, every transactions are recorded in DAG immediately. So the coins are spend definitely and spender can not reverse the transactions at all. In recipient side, s/he can spend coins after 12 hours. If spender tries to cheat the coins, the coins could be ceased in favor of network treasury.
The critic that merely technical people may make is “the 12-hour delay in permitting to spend money is too much”.
The answer is yes. 12 hours is too much, but in what point of view and which concept? The Comen is not designed for speculation, and it is far beyond an only money transfer rail, so it do not care about speed that much.
In a world in which people do not get paid even after of months of hard working, 12 hours delay won’t hurt anyone. In addition this 12 hours maturate time will help network functionality in countries with slow and limited internet connection and covers propagation delay.
Unlike the gov-corp hypocrisy projects, Comen is intended to prepare services for real no-banked people in poor countries.
Meanwhile system must be resilience for any kind of sabotages like slowing down internet connection. Again, for most general financial activities, 12 hour is pretty good time frame.
Additionally some features like speed, and huge data process/transfer ability forces project to be used by who can afford these services, means more centralization, which is not the goal of The New Paradigm”.
The New Paradigm is not only a technological fix.
It is a whole different level in human history. There is trade off between a humanistic pure decentralized free system, and a biased high performance commercial system.
The New Paradigm stands for more decentralization and more freedom.
Some other technical notes about Comen could be data congestion problem, spamming, vector attack, Sybil attack, DoS/DDoS attacks, etc… that are fixed by Comen architecture and for the sake of brevity I do not go to detail in this article.
The Comen software and its proper technology is enough good to start.
It is a minimum viable product (MVP) which doesn’t claim a perfect product at all, but the ideology behind it and its developing roadmap and mechanisms, leads it to be a global high quality product, which “everyone” can install and use it by two or three clicks. The Comen users take
human society steps closer to prosperity.
“imagine” all the people sharing all the world
John Lennon
Here, to delve deeper into the “The New Paradigm” potentials and practical details, I intend to explain an early community that is powered by the software as a tangible and real world example. This community is called “imagine”, inspired by the famous song of the same name from Beatles.
The first and most important mission of “imagine” is to implement, develop and gift this software to the world. The “imagine” motto is “fair effort, fair gain, win-win-win”, where the winners are the world, the “imagine” community, and the participator, respectively.
I have created and enacted some rules according to my plan for improving this community. Are my rules capitalistic or socialistic or under certain doctrines, regimes, or schools of thought? While the answer does not really
matter, my answer is yes and no simultaneously. Indeed, I do not want to fit “myself”, “The New Paradigm” and the “imagine” community in any “ism” at all. I made the system which “I” think will work for my philanthropist visions, while other people can establish different communities and different strategies as they believe.
I set proper rules to achieve the proposal’s goals and ship the software, as free as possible, as open as possible, as flexible as possible, as robust as possible, and as un-stoppable as possible. Hopefully, successive communities use the released software and ancestors’ experiences happily.
Are the laws I have passed for the “imagine” community the best, fairest, and most complete laws? Certainly not, and I have no such claim either. The first rule of imagine is: “every single decision must be made based on the vote of the community members.”, thus over time “imagine” rules will be changed dramatically. This is good for both the community and the software.
Let’s return, to money and figure out how money flows in the “imagine” community. In “imagine” I created scarce money. That is, the software is configured to create a fixed amount of coins every day. So the issuance of money is regulated, predictable, and there is no way to increase it overnight.
Then I set the rules for dividing these coins between community members. The mechanism of distribution of coins in imagine is simple and straightforward. Whole coins will be divided between participators (aka shareholders or community members) in proportion to their shares. Who works more obtains more shares, who works less obtains fewer shares, but it is not merely a meritocracy, since it has some complementary mechanisms to moderate it that you can find more about it here:
“Can we imagine an alternative monetary model to recover our current economic fails” and “There is no place for feats, beauty and heroic deeds in the modern world”
On this manner of dividing cash, the next questions come to thoughts.
- What sort of participation, folks can do in think about group?
- Who and the way can we measure and consider their participation amount
and high quality?
Certainly there isn’t a restrict for actions and even no-activities (e.g. UBI).
Which means if the present group members -for any cause and by any mechanism- are satisfied that individual Y deserves Z quantity of shares, then individual Y might be a shareholder of the system, and due to that shares, s/he might be receives a commission a portion of every day X minted cash, unconditionally.
Additionally, individual Y may have voting proper in proportion to her/his Z shares of system whole shares.
In think about individuals are inspired to speak about what’s “good job“ for world and try this “good job” and report it in a worldwide clear, un-censorable, un-stoppable and un-corruptible ledger and being rewarded by doing these. It’s a sensible altruism. It’s what all of us have been looking for for, from being human in first place and it’s purpose the the all philanthropist ideologies until now. The “think about” group is shaped based mostly on these values.
In think about the group members are all proposers and evaluators concurrently. They consider and settle for (or reject) the opposite person’s proposal. Each single proposal is put to a vote, and “all” group can/will up-vote or refute the proposal.
Individuals can ship proposals for collaborating in “think about” actions and change into the member of a group. On this stage, the actions are primarily growing software program, testing, designing and translating. However the group all the time welcomes all new concepts, even when one believes that feeding an elephant in Africa has a constructive impact on bettering the general situation of human society.
The way in which “think about” creates and distributes cash prevents the “Cantillon impact”, and runs a rational money circulation – Do not spend it suddenly or HODL it without end. (neither inflationary nor hyper-deflationary)
The cash and energy distribution in “think about” is a good, environment friendly, and democratic method at native, nationwide, and international ranges.
Concerning the truth that this cash and the group round it, are created by the primary one that put in the software program on her/his pc and invited others to affix her/his community, the group members and
their horizons are strongly tied to intentions, tendencies, and beliefs of its founder(s) and early members.
So the benevolent originator will run the software program and can invite like-minded sincere folks and -probably- will set up and develop a Utopian society, whereas depraved folks will set up a corrupt group.
The evil folks have already got their instruments and most likely don’t want
our new child software program, however a few of them will attempt to receive nearly all of shares of our sincere group with the intention to exploit it or destroy it, since they’d most likely be extra motivated for doing so.
So how can we forestall them from that? Right here, the idea of “energy of fragility” involves the image. The software program that manages group points is open-source and free. It’s designed to be totally decentralized, versatile, and user-friendly.
Everybody with out technical abilities can set up the software program, configure the group settings, financial mechanisms, and governing guidelines in a few hours. Customers can launch their very own new territory, new cash,
and new guidelines. There isn’t any monopoly, management, or privileges.
The software program additionally helps immigration. That’s, if some members of a group usually are not proud of the group, they will fork it and set up a brand new group.
They’ll selectively port the historical past, cash, guidelines, and configurations of the previous group to a brand new one.
They’ll re-configure a brand new group hoping the brand new group grows
with out malicious members. Good actors boycott unhealthy actors (or vice versa) by operating polling with minimal price. Each previous and new communities may have their cash. Most likely each will lose a portion of their cash’s worth, and that’s okay too.
If the dispute wasn’t grave, most likely they are going to discover some resolution to keep away from splitting and shedding the inhabitants and the worth of their wealth, since that they had cultivated their frequent world by spending time, try and religion. Right here the “cancel tradition” prices way over tolerance, debate, and constructive communication.
The splitting impacts straight on each member of the group by decreasing their cash energy and their group repute. It’s the conscience of the “energy of fragility”. Nothing occurs in a single day, neither germinating a group nor the destruction of a civilization.
All through historical past, civilizations have all the time moved on the sting of the stability between preserving residents completely satisfied or disintegrating, and this story will proceed for our communities as properly.
By the best way, within the “think about” governing mannequin, there may be potential for doubt. For instance it appears unlikely and likewise impractical that everybody to judge each proposal and each work collectively, and take part in each polling.
Thus we want one other mechanism to encourage folks to take part in a proposal analysis. The rule is “each new proposal by default is permitted”. If nobody votes, the proposal might be permitted after the ballot time-frame mechanically.
Because the issuing cash quantity is mounted, new shareholders imply much less dividend to present members. Thus group has sufficient incentive to take part in polling and can examine properly on each single proposal. It’s an instantaneous democracy. Is it technically doable?
In previous classical human interplay, this type of decision-making was too expensive and almost unimaginable, however with the web and blockchain expertise, it’s doable, even for your entire world inhabitants. Issues might be dealt with extra successfully by liquid-democracy and even quadratic voting.
All are relevant within the proposed software program/group.
By this design at this level there’s a chance that there’s a perverse incentive for present shareholders to undervalue the work of different folks (even as much as zero). Lets say the group consists of solely myself as an initiative shareholder.
I’ve complete shares and I’ll get all the brand new cash. If I don’t discover someone who settle for my cash in trade for his or her items or providers, the cash is price nothing.
It is clear that due to our human nature, we desire to maintain extra cash
for ourselves. If it isn’t doable, we’ll divide cash between as few as doable folks, and if this isn’t doable both, we’ll divide it between our clan.
However none of those three approaches will assist the group in sustainable progress. Significantly the worth of the cash of the group is straight affected by the standard of the group in each side. For a community-based cash, nobody will settle for the cash that owned by a bunch of grasping hoarders.
Thus the community must be expanded and embrace new members to lift the cash usability, applicability and recognition with the intention to advance its market vary. Though larger group means fewer every day cash for every, but in addition means extra usability and applicability for the cash.
Therefore group must be grown and each choice is made by polling. The group wants so as to add extra sincere folks and never corrupted ones. In any other case, the group dies within the early stage and their cash won’t ever be a useful asset. The group grows due to its enchancment and vice versa.
Cash is only a group hallucination however that does not imply it’s a simple factor to create (if you don’t use the violence or army pressure).
The group round that cash could be established and develop or simply die in a short time. It’s a trade-off, and the result will depend on how group members mature and the way a lot they care concerning the group.
What about unhealthy actors?
Even unhealthy actors should comply with guidelines and do one thing good for the system to acquire system shares. Their contribution empowers the system as properly. There’s a catastrophic case by which nearly all of the system are unhealthy actors and so they settle for corrupted proposals to achieve increasingly energy. The “energy of fragility” is the answer.
The “think about” group is a show of “The New Paradigm” concept in observe. Whereas the software program and the “think about” group are the product, they’re additionally the technique of manufacturing.
In keeping with the mechanism of distribution of wealth, energy, and software program providers (resembling monetary sovereignty services, privateness care messenger and social community, democratic voting system, decentralized area identify service(DNS) and decentralized web site, wiki, weblog, video channel service, in complete a greater web), we are able to declare that “think about” and software program are additionally an “allocation” on the identical time. In abstract, in “think about” the group decides what to supply, tips on how to produce, for whom to supply, and why to supply.
The “think about” group isn’t just producing free software program.
The “think about” reeds a tradition of “decentralized manufacturing” (aka “peer manufacturing”) and ParEcon, that utilizing decentralized and open cash, which would be the foundation for the manufacturing of different decentralized merchandise resembling open {hardware}, open expertise, open medical, and many others… in “The New Paradigm”.
All-told, no matter “isms” and the labels, “The New Paradigm” proposes a system of applied sciences and those who make an actual clear free market of ideas (a realization of Agora and “Vita Activa” in 21 century) the place folks freely can help or reject any thought with minimal price.
They help a group by becoming a member of to it or just accepting the cash of that group (in trade of their items or providers) or vice versa, condemn it by leaving the group or just not accepting or devaluing the cash of a specific group.
It’s the best and most sensible strategy to display democracy in all native, nationwide and international ranges. The free alternative of free folks determines the communities progress course. Their alternative elevates society or turns it into an deserted territory. No must argue, quarrel, or struggle. No want for conflict.
These communities usually are not merely on-line teams since they have an effect on folks’s actual lives in several methods. As a sensible instance, we described a realized group referred to as “think about, which was created by the software program with the intention to preserve the software program.
The “think about” represents one of many 1000’s of potential methods to generate and distribute cash and energy, which could be created by this software program.
To be able to be part of to community you want a standard pc (both laptop computer or desktop) and a few pc abilities. We Will take away this technical dependency quickly, so we’ll want simply keen customers to obtain software program and set up it and hook up with web. Then you need to use software program to
switch cash or use boards, wiki pages and take part within the mission improvement.
The “think about” group appears for the energetic participation of software program builders, hacktivists, activists, artists, and researchers to flourish
it.
EMAIL: evergreener@riseup.internet
Tags
Create your free account to unlock your customized studying expertise.
